Author Archives:

Boys, Girls, and Experience in the Classroom

Dialogue is incredibly potent in terms of being able to open a productive space to work in simply because “difference” produces raw material to work with.
Continue reading

Posted in 1st year Composition, Critical Pedagogy, Culture of Academia, Rhetoric

A quote on my mind the past couple months…

…at no matter what risk.
Continue reading

Posted in Critical Pedagogy, Culture of Academia, Future of Higher-Ed, Philosophy of Education, Random Thoughts

Nailing THE question right on the head.

And yet…this is the question that I fear we often forget to ask.
Continue reading

Posted in Critical Pedagogy, Culture of Academia, Dewey, Future of Higher-Ed, Philosophy of Education

Disembodied Discourse and the Failure of Internet Discussion

Asynchronous and electronically mediated communication can be dialogic if and only if we have habits of interaction that compel us to see and understand that bodies are involved even in online textual interaction. This, then, becomes an educational problem, and one in which education in the past 50 years has shied away from in order to focus on curriculum and content instead of habits of interaction.
Continue reading

Posted in Future of Higher-Ed, Philosophy of Education, Random Thoughts, Rhetoric, Technology in Education, Theories of Education

Thoughts to think about at the end of one semester and the beginning of another

What is important? Why do we stay up night worrying?
Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized

Poor Professor Higgins Indeed

“The ultimate goal of assessment, then, is to make visible the relative social positions and statuses of all engaged in education, from taxpayers to legislators to teachers to students.”
Continue reading

Posted in Composition, Critical Pedagogy, General Pedagogy, Philosophy of Education, Theories of Education | Tagged , ,

Notes on the search for the student text

In other words, the way we talk about and enact the project of education not only defines who and what the student-subject is, but also enables the student to perform productively within the classroom. It is through this reflexive relationship between educational discourse and student-subject identity that the meaning of education is created, controlled, and potentially transformed.
Continue reading

Posted in Composition, Philosophy of Education, Random Thoughts, Theories of Education

Textbooks in the classroom: a few thoughts.

A few harmless thoughts on what I like to think of as the “military-industrial complex of academia:” textbooks and their publishers.
Continue reading

Posted in 1st year Composition, Culture of Academia, Paradigms in Education, Philosophy of Education, Random Thoughts, Rhetoric of Education, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Teaching Philosophy, Theories of Education

Five areas of attention for the next 50 years in education, educational research.

Five areas we should focus on for the next 50 years.
Continue reading

Posted in Culture of Academia, Dewey, Future of Higher-Ed, Philosophy of Education, Theories of Education

The Job Market Myth

Simply put: what goes on in the classroom is a small, insignificant part of very large and complex equation that results in gainful employment upon leaving college.
Continue reading

Posted in Culture of Academia